'Claremont serial killer investigation: Ciara Glennon's murderer linked to unsolved rape'. Leading police to suspect that an unidentified serial killer was the offender. Some believe that the 1988 disappearance of Julie Cutler, 22, is also related.' Claremont Serial Murders 1996-7. See more What others are saying. Summary: The Long Island Serial Killer operated around Gilgo Beach, NY for. Here's a profile posted by the NYT of this suspect. With the guy who was arrested in the case of the Claremont Serial Killer, he was somewhat.

BRET CHRISTIAN: There is a man that the police have been watching from very early on in the investigation, and he appears to be a prime suspect. Vast amounts of resources have gone into watching his every movement, to following him, to surveilling him in all sorts of different ways. BRET CHRISTIAN: I think our community's been lulled into a false sense of security by the - sort of the sly nod and the wink that, 'Look, we really know who's done this. We've been watching him. 'And since we've been watching him there's been no other murders.' That's actually wrong. There HAVE been other murders - just not any more in Claremont.

Is there a plausible reason why the video has only just now been released to the broader public.? It's strange isn't it. This case is markedly different to others in respect to the suppression of information on the part of the WA Police.

Obviously they have their reasons and motives but things that become common information in these kind of cases like how the victims were killed etc are still widely unknown about this case and remain officially unreleased, still, 12 years later. It seems strange. Police have spoken to every single person that set foot in Claremont that night except for him? And he actually spoke to her, I think that is extremely significant. See I'm on the other end of the scale, I think they're making too much of it. I watch the CI Australia doco last night and all it seemed like was that he might have made a joke or a passing comment that she's reacted to and laughed at, they were jumping from that to 'Oh she clearly recognises this man' I think that's going a little too far, if you filmed half of Northbridge at 2am on a Saturday night hundreds of complete strangers are interacting with each other and probably looking on CCTV like they might have known each other for years.

That's just the effects of social clubs & alcohol IMO. I do think whoever it is, if they can even remember that IS them by now, should come forward. I'm quite befuddled and just a little annoyed that the footage of Jane talking to this mystery man wasn't made public earlier. How is anyone going to remember details of that (at the time totally insignificant) conversation between 2 random people outside of a busy nightspot 12 YEARS LATER? You'd think that if the man in the video had nothing to hide, he would have gone to police 12 years ago and said he was speaking to Jane outside the club that night and they would have identified him then. The fact that this obviously didn't happen leaves me at a loss as to why they didn't make a more public effort to identify this man waaaay sooner. This not wanting to 'narrow the scope of the investigation' excuse just doesn't fly IMO I often think about this case.

A few elements of it hit very close to home. I'm just wondering if Sarah's remains might be up in the hills somewhere - there's a bit of a dumping ground in the bush around mundaring Whoever did this left Jane south and Ciara north. He obviously didn't want to create a pattern or draw attention by sticking to one area to dispose of remains so I guess it kind of makes sense that Sarah might be east in the hills. I really hope they find her •. I often think about this case.

A few elements of it hit very close to home. I'm just wondering if Sarah's remains might be up in the hills somewhere - there's a bit of a dumping ground in the bush around mundaring There were actually a series of comments made on one of the blogs on The Australian newspaper's website. The person was posting in the comments section of a blog made by one of the Australian's writers alluding to the whereabouts of Sarah's body and a second blog was written about the person making the comments alone. Very disturbing. There were actually a series of comments made on one of the blogs on The Australian newspaper's website.

The person was posting in the comments section of a blog made by one of the Australian's writers alluding to the whereabouts of Sarah's body and a second blog was written about the person making the comments alone. Hmm, I just read through all of that. It sounds like the person who posted on the blog knew more than they should have. I thought the question about the jewellery interesting & the answer. Wonder if that was common knowledge? Just because this guy was cleared by his DNA doesn't mean he wasn't involved in it. Wouldn't be the first killer engineered someone else to do it to get his kicks watching someone else carry it out.